Spurs Remain Atop Standings, If Not Ratings
By Forrest Burnson
For Reporting Texas
The San Antonio Spurs, the Western Conference’s top-seeded team in the upcoming National Basketball Association playoffs, bear two noteworthy – and perhaps contradictory – distinctions.
On one hand, the team is the country’s most successful professional sports franchise in the past 15 years,winning nearly 70 percent of its games to edge the New England Patriots of the National Football League for the accolade.
On the other hand, the team’s four championship titles were among the NBA’s least-watched on television. In 2007, when the Spurs defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers (and LeBron James before he left for Miami) to win their fourth title, the finals received the lowest Nielsen ratings in league history, withthe Associated Press declaring the Spurs “a champion everywhere but in the TV ratings” and “too boring to be appreciated.”
The second-lowest rated championship in the NBA? The Spurs’ 2003 title over the New Jersey Nets.
Low network ratings translate into little or no coverage in national media for the Spurs.
“It’s all ratings-driven. It’s become a big joke,” said Buck Harvey, a sports columnist for The San Antonio Express-News. “They just don’t want to hear about the Spurs.”
The low ratings have been partially attributed to the Spurs’ small media market. Even though San Antonio is the seventh most populous city in the United States, Nielsen ranks its local television market at 36th. The Spurs have had good regional ratings on the Fox Sports Southwest network, but in Texas, loyalties remain divided between the Spurs, the Dallas Mavericks and the Houston Rockets.
Despite the team’s consistent success for the past decade, no Spur was among the top 10 players in jersey sales last season.
Some attribute the Spurs’ lack of a fan base outside of San Antonio to the low-key nature of the team’s star players, especially power forward Tim Duncan.
“Duncan is clearly one of the game’s greatest players ever, but he’s not spectacular, just incredibly good,” said Mike Celizic, a columnist for NBC Sports, after the Spurs’ 2007 win.
With headlines like “Tim Duncan’s Sincere Apology Confuses Referee Enough To Eject Him From Game,” and “Tim Duncan Fires Up Teammates With Calm, Moderated, Three-Hour Pep Talk,” the satirical newspaper The Onion has turned the player – an uncharacteristically reserved NBA star with an honors degree in psychology from Wake Forest – into a running gag.
Despite jabs at his demeanor, Duncan has been credited for providing the foundation for the team’s continued success, due in part to his close relationship with coach Gregg Popovich.
The top-seeded team in last year’s playoffs, the Spurs were upset by the Memphis Grizzlies in the first round. With the recent acquisitions of Boris Diaw and Kawhi Leonard, the team appears more balanced going into this season’s playoffs, which the Spurs begin Sunday against the Utah Jazz.
For the Spurs, the whole might be greater than the sum of its parts. Since the departure of NBA legend David Robinson in 2003, the team’s success has hinged on the trifecta of Duncan, Manu Ginobili of Argentina and Tony Parker of France. None of them holds the same superstar power of Kobe Bryant and James, though Parker’s marriage — and subsequent divorce — to actress and activist Eva Longoria made him more visible outside the basketball arena.
With the Spurs, “you don’t have any controversy, you don’t have people arguing whose team it is or who should take the shot,” Harvey said.
While the Spurs’ lack of an obvious superstar has limited the team’s national appeal, that same team-oriented approach is a big part of the appeal for Spurs fans. “The Spurs play fundamental basketball,” said Josh O’Brien, a San Antonio native and a longtime fan. “The players don’t look for huge endorsement contracts or massive media exposure.”
The team’s virtual anonymity outside of San Antonio may actually be a boon to the players, who avoid the pitfalls of heavy media attention — and criticism.
For Spurs players, Harvey said, “life is a free lunch” in San Antonio.
Reporting Texas is a digital media initiative from the School of Journalism at the University of Texas at Austin. Reporting Texas accepts submissions from undergraduate and graduate students throughout the university, promoting engagement in the digital age of journalism.
Supported by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and its Initiative on the Future of Journalism Education, Reporting Texas serves four primary goals: To showcase the best work of our University of Texas at Austin undergraduate and graduate students; to offer quality, multimedia reporting to local, state, and national news outlets; to experiment with new approaches in journalism education; and to combine aspects of community reporting with multimedia resources.
These efforts grow out of two previous initiatives at the University of Texas at Austin School of Journalism – CapLink and the Capital News Service – in which student journalists provided free public affairs reporting to community newspapers around Texas. In that spirit, Reporting Texas offers all content free of charge to all news outlets as long as we are credited for our work.
Reporting Texas focuses on unique and often hidden stories, using text, photos, audio, and video to provide views of in-depth people and places rarely seen in the news.
Also, you can check us out on Twitter.
And once again, welcome to Reporting Texas!