East Texas also normally has an abundance of water that is integral to these industries. However, powers are at work other than fair market value to take the water (along with the private property which is used to collect it) for another region without our region’s consent, control, or benefit.
We usually call that stealing except when the government does it for the “public good.” In this case, what may be “public good” for North Central Texas, may well prove to cripple Northeast Texas if the Executive Administrator (EA) of the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) has his way.
Instead of facilitating a reasonable compromise on methods of conserving and distributing our region’s water without damaging our socio-economic, agricultural, and environmental conditions, the EA has recommended to the TWDB to require the plans of the Northeast Texas planning group (NET Region D) to omit its current and even any future objections to the plans of the Dallas-Fort Worth area planning group (DFW Region C) to build the Marvin Nichols Reservoir in Northeast Texas.
I believe East Texans are willing to make sacrifices to supply water to the Dallas-Fort Worth area, but they do not want another regional planning group or the state dictating how to do it. Furthermore, East Texans want to protect their environment, their economic development, their jobs, their industries, and their farms — as state statute requires in planning for future water needs.
What is needed is not just a plan without regional conflict, but a feasible and mutually beneficial plan that respects the rights and future development of each region.
Even the EA has admitted that relying on the Marvin Nichols Reservoir is not feasible because it is highly unlikely that it can be permitted and built in time to meet the projected needs of DFW Region C. Why then has he proposed to eradicate the conflict on paper if it is impractical? Why would he do so prior even to public comment? Besides throwing out local control of planning, his injudicious and inequitable proposal may well cause future investment and development in major industries in Northeast Texas to begin to dry up.
Why not require DFW Region D to incorporate other viable alternatives to supply the water that mutually benefit each region? Impounding more water in Lake Wright Patman, purchasing more water from the existing Toledo Bend Reservoir, and neighboring states are all reasonable alternatives brought to the table by NET Region D.
The struggle between DFW Region C and NET Region D planning groups makes the contests with the federal Bureau of Land Management look like skirmishes. Marvin Nichols is not just about supplying water; it’s about a massive land grab where East Texans lose control of potentially an area the size of Dallas or Harrison County — 900 plus square miles!
According to the Texas Forest Service Marvin Nichols involves not only converting approximately 70,000 acres of East Texas prime hardwood forestland to a reservoir but also the taking of another 188,000 to 750,000 acres (or more, as determined by federal agencies) from private landowners and production in various industries and setting it aside forever to satisfy federal environmental mitigation requirements.
The three members of the TWDB need the wisdom of Solomon to discern who is grabbing what is not theirs and who is willing to give up much of what is theirs to preserve life and help their fellow Texans. The baby in this case is not just water, but the land and livelihoods of thousands of East Texans.
— State Representative David Simpson (R-Longview) serves District 7, comprised of Gregg and Upshur Counties, in the Texas House
The TWDB is having a public hearing in Mount Pleasant on Tuesday, April 29, and in Arlington on Wednesday, April 30, and is receiving public comment (via email, etc.) through May 2 about the conflict between Region C and D's plans concerning Marvin Nichols. See https://www.twdb.texas.gov/home/tabs/doc/hot/RegionCandDConflict.asp